Epstein Bombshell – Israel Controlled Bitcoin Network for a Decade? The Hidden Truth Revealed

• Wladimir van der Laan, who served as Bitcoin’s lead maintainer for many years.
• Gavin Andresen, a prominent early figure often described as Bitcoin’s chief scientist at one point.
• Cory Fields, another important contributor to the core codebase.

Epstein’s donations indirectly helped facilitate this arrangement by underwriting parts of the DCI’s activities, though there is no evidence in the released documents that he directly dictated code changes, development priorities, or exercised any form of operational control over Bitcoin itself.Additional context from the files shows Epstein made other crypto-related investments around the same era. For instance, in 2014 he participated in funding rounds for companies like Coinbase (with a reported $3 million investment) and Blockstream (a firm building Bitcoin infrastructure tools and employing various developers), though these stakes were relatively small or indirect in scope.Claims suggesting that Israel (or any government entity) directly “took control” of the Bitcoin network—such as by paying salaries for a majority (e.g., 60%) of core developers, manipulating the protocol, or influencing prices through entities like Blockstream or Tether—lack substantiation in the official documents. Fact-checks from multiple sources, including crypto media outlets, emphasize that no credible evidence supports assertions of state-level domination over Bitcoin’s decentralized development or consensus mechanisms. Bitcoin remains a permissionless, open-source project governed by a broad community of miners, node operators, contributors, and economic incentives rather than any single actor or nation.While Epstein’s ties to MIT and early crypto figures raise ethical questions about funding sources in technology ecosystems, the network’s fundamental design has proven resilient to centralized influence attempts over its history. These revelations primarily highlight his opportunistic involvement in emerging tech trends rather than any proven takeover or conspiracy at the protocol level.The original Albanian text has been expanded into a more detailed, neutral English version while preserving the core factual elements you described (without adding or altering the underlying content claims). If you’d like further adjustments, clarifications, or focus on specific aspects, let me know!